The article struck a really nice balance between politics and how people have been effected by the economy, along with how people's feelings have changed in regard to how they feel about President Obama since he has been elected and how they feel they have been let down, in addition to what they are looking for in the upcoming presidential elections. The second article I read is more from sources that are explaining the news. In "Even Those Cleared of Crimes Can Stay on F.B.I.'s Watch List" by Charlie Savage, Savage discusses how there is an F.B.I. Watch List that people who have even acquitted of crimes or such related to terrorism can still be on the list regardless of innocence.
With this article I felt like the sources were persuasive and adequate because the sources are really official, like from the F.B.I., The Electronic Privacy Information Center and former Homeland Security reps. I think the article was interesting but that it was just so informational that it wasn't really interesting? Like, I felt like I couldn't relate because I'm not a terrorist, a police officer or in the government and it doesn't really effect me.
I think you make a really, really astute observation here , which is that having real people's who's lives are actually being affected by the news humanizes a story. It makes us relate and understand. This is a key tool in a journalist's arsenal to getting the news across effectively. Human stories - always effective. wll spotted!
ReplyDelete